SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
M/s.Saptakiri Milk Products Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.Devaraj

Table of Content
1. guidelines adherence for one-time settlements. (Para 1 , 2)

The petitioners' case in the matter of challenge to rejection of their application for one-time settlement is based on the Reserve Bank of India's guidelines dated 03.09.2005. The petitioners have not set out the guideline which was in force on the date of their application for one-time settlement i.e. on 28.03.2025.

2. Therefore, the petition in the present form does not give rise to any triable cause of action. The petition is dismissed; however with liberty to file a proper petition. There will be no order as to costs. 3. WMP No.47510 of 2025 filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition is allowed, subject to payment of separate court fees within a period of two weeks from today.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top