Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
Zubaitha Begum – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by its Home Secretary, Prison Department (IV) St. George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of petitioners and representations for early release (Para 1) |
| 2. court's review of interim bail procedures (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. interim bail considerations and legal precedents (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. distinction between custody and release procedures (Para 5 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. authority of courts vs. government in granting bail and remission (Para 10 , 13 , 18) |
| 6. court's role in reviewing remission requests (Para 14 , 15 , 20) |
| 7. limitations of judicial mandate in concerning early release (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. conclusions on petition for premature release and government authority (Para 27 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
COMMON ORDER
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
W.P.Nos.30216, 30212, 30505, 30514 of 2024, 31417, 31415 of 2023 have been filed for a direction to the Government to release the convict prisoners prematurely, by considering the representation of the petitioners therein. The miscellaneous petitions in W.P.M.P.(Crl.) Nos.530, 531, 532, 533, 583 & 584 of 2025 and the writ petitions in W.P.(Crl.) Nos.1113, 1114, 1115, 1116, 1117, 1119, 1121 of 2025 have been filed to extend the interim bail/leave granted to the convict prisoners, pending consideration of the representation before the Government to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
