SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67329

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J
M.R.Paruvatham – Appellant
Versus
Ranjith Kumar – Respondent
A.No.4118 of 2025 in C.S.No.34 of 2025 in O.A.No.168 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Srikanth
For the Respondents: Ms.S.Karpagapriya, Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar, Mr.S.Sathish Rajan

An applicant may withdraw their application, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn without prejudice.

Headnote:The application was made under Order XIV Rule 8 of the OS Rules and Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint. The learned counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application, which was endorsed accordingly. The Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. application for withdrawal of the case. (Para 1)
2. application dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 2)

ORDER

Mr.T.Srikanth, the learned counsel for the applicant in the application, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant and the endorsement so made, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top