SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 79647

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Anushka Constructions Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
G.Corp lotus mall private ltd – Respondent
CRP Nos.3187, 3939 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Senior counsel, for Mr.Surya Teja SS Nalla
For the Respondents: Mr.B. Madhan Babu

Petitioners can withdraw revision petitions to seek suitable relief in a different jurisdiction.

Headnote:In relation to CRP Nos.3187 and 3939 of 2025, the petitioners sought to set aside orders from the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal; the petitioners opted to withdraw their petitions to file appropriate applications elsewhere. The court observed the withdrawals as presented by the learned counsel. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs awarded.

Table of Content
1. petitioners chose to withdraw their petitions. (Para 1)
2. court dismissed the petitions without costs. (Para 2)

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the revision petitions and states that the petitioners want to file appropriate petition before the High Court of Karnataka.

2. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, based on the above statement. Consequently, CMP Nos.17739 and 20649 of 2025 are closed. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top