Anushka Constructions Private Ltd. vs G.Corp lotus mall private ltd

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Anushka Constructions Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
G.Corp lotus mall private ltd – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Senior counsel, for Mr.Surya Teja SS Nalla
For the Respondents: Mr.B. Madhan Babu

Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the revision petitions and states that the petitioners want to file appropriate petition before the High Court of Karnataka.

2. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, based on the above statement. Consequently, CMP Nos.17739 and 20649 of 2025 are closed. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASMANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, JAnushka Constructions Private Ltd. – AppellantVersusG.Corp lotus mall private ltd – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Anushka Constructions Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
G.Corp lotus mall private ltd – Respondent