SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, JJ
Kesavan S/o Late Gurusamy – Appellant
Versus
Parvathi W/o Late Manickam – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan

For Appellants :Mr.R.Thamarai Selvan J U D G M E N T Dr.G.Jayachandran, J.

The order of the learned single Judge directing the Tahsildar, Mettur, Salem to conduct survey of the disputed land and fix boundary stone in W.P.No.32483 of 2025 dated 25.08.2025 is challenged by way of intra court appeal by the 4th and 5th respondents. However, the appeal suffers a delay of

49 days.

2. When the matter is taken up for considering the petition for condonation of the said delay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/appellants states that the Tahsildar has completed the mandate issued by this Court in the Writ Petition and therefore the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal and they may be given liberty to challenge the outcome of the survey report.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the delay petition as well as the Writ Appeal in SR stage stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top