SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, C.Kumarappan, JJ
Kumaresan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP(MD) No. 25183 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Sankar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Mr.M.Beema Rao

The dismissal of a writ petition confirmed no encroachment based on surveyed evidence, affirming the importance of due process and administrative findings in land disputes.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to a writ petition seeking a mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the removal of alleged encroachments. The Court found no merit in allegations of encroachment after reviewing the survey report confirming no encroachment. The Court emphasizes adherence to procedural justice and validation through appropriate investigators. Ultimately, the Court dismisses the writ petition as there exists no encroachment, establishing administrative accountability in land disputes.

Table of Content
1. overview of encroachment claims and initial petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. survey results confirm no encroachment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. decision to dismiss writ petition. (Para 7)

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) The prayer of the petitioner is for a mandamus directing R1 to R3 to remove the encroachment allegedly made by R4 in Survey No. 303/1G, Madhukur Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District (subject property).

2.Series of orders have been passed in this case, which would show the trajectory of the hearings, which are extracted herein.

“15.09.2025:

Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for R1 to R3.

2.Notice through Court as well as privately to R4 returnable 07.10.2025. Proof of service be placed on file.

3.The prayer is for a Mandamus directing the official respondents to remove the encroachment made by R4 in Survey No.303/1G, Madhukur Village, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District.

4.Based on the petitioner's representation, the authorities are in the process of conducting a survey. Mr.S.P.Maharajan informs us that the survey is scheduled to be held on 18.09.2025. Let the survey be conducted in the presence of both the petitioner and private respondents.

5.Hence, list on 07.10.2025 to receive report.”

24.10.2025:

2.Status report is filed by the Tashildar, Pattukottai, wherein he categorically states at para 5 as follows:

“5.It is submitted that, The Revenue Officials had conducted the survey, on 19-09-2025 with the help of revenue Records, and the surveyor had submitted the survey report through Revenue Inspector on the same day of the survey. Further the Revenue Inspector, madhkur Zone had forwarded the detail report vide the proceedings in U.Mu.174/2025 dated 19-09-2025 with all reports with regard to the Survey No.303/1G,304/14,304/1 situated at Madhukur Village to the Authorities and survey out Come reveals that, there is no encroachment in the Nilayial Salai and the details are Mentioned below:-

Village S.No. Classification of the land Total extent Extent of encroachment Nature of the Encroachment
Madhukur Village 303/ 1G Nilaviyal Thar SALAI 0.02.5 ares No Encroachment No Encroachment
It is submitted that the above survey was conducted by following the due process of law and by following the principles of the Natural Justice. Therefore I prayed this Hon'ble court may be pleased to accept this status report in W.P(MD) No. 25183 of 2025, pending on the file of this Hon'ble court.”

3.Perusal of the above will show that the authorities confirm that there is no encroachment in Survey No.303/1G, Madhukur Village, Pattukottai District. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner would insist that there is an encroachment and would also request for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, who would be neutral.

4.Hence, Mr.Beema Rao, learned counsel [Enrl. No.

3086/2016, No.182, Law Chambers, High Court Buildings, Madurai-23] is appointed as Advocate Commissioner.

5.The learned Advocate Commissioner shall attend the office of the Tahsildar at Pattukottai at 11.00 a.m., on 27.10.2025 accompanied by a copy of this order. The Tahsildar / his Deputy shall accompany the learned Advocate Commissioner and assist him in identifying the land, inspecting necessary records in relation to the land in question and to determine whether there are any encroachments thereupon. A report shall be filed by the learned Advocate Commissioner within a week thereafter.

6.Copy of the report shall be served in advance on the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Maharajan, learned Additional Government Pleader.

7.Expenses borne by the learned Advocate Commissioner shall be reimbursed by the petitioner. The initial fee payable to the learned Advocate Commissioner is fixed at a sum of Rs.30,000/-

(Rupees Thirty Thousand only).

8.List on 04.11.2025 to receive a report.”

14.11.2025:

“Read this order in continuation of and in conjunction with order

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top