Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
P.Pugalenthi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner applied for land survey based on legal heirship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government advocates proposed procedural notification. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directed further actions with a completion timeline. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
By relying on patta No.333 in the name of the petitioner's father, the petitioner had applied for a survey of land in survey No.322/1A1 of an extent of 2.42 ares.
2. At the last hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested for time to produce the death certificate and legal heirship certificate of his father. The said documents have been filed today. The death certificate discloses that his father died on 20.04.2024. The legal heirship certificate sets out the names of six Class-I legal heirs, including the petitioner. In view of these documents, a case is made out to consider the petitioner's request.
3. Learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 4 submits that a notice would be issued to owners of relevant adjacent lands and a decision would be taken after considering objections, if any, from them.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents 2 to 4 to initiate action on the petitioner's request for a s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
