IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Kannappan – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District – Respondent
O R D E R
By relying on a sale deed dated 22.10.1990 and patta No.2312, the petitioner had applied on 02.06.2025 for a survey of 27 ares in survey No.221/1B2. The present Writ Petition relates thereto.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that survey notice was issued on two occasions earlier, but that the survey was not conducted. He also states that respondents 4 and 5 are not connected to the property, but that they raised objections.
3. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice for the third respondent. Learned Government Advocate submits that notice would be issued to owners of adjoining lands and to the fourth and fifth respondents. Before taking a decision, he states that their objections, if any, would be considered.
4. In view of the above submissions of learned Government Advocate, it is unnecessary to issue notice to the private respondents in this Writ Petition. Instead, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the first and second respondents to conduct an inquiry in relation to the petitioner's request for a survey after issuing notice to owners of relevant adjacent lands and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.