IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
N.Gnana Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims land entitlement supported by deeds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court directs survey process with specified timeline. (Para 5) |
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY N.Gnana Subramanian ... Petitioner Vs
1. The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.
2. The Taluk Surveyor, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Kandamanur Vilakku Police Station, Theni District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 2 to conduct survey as per Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and to fix boundaries in respect of lands comprised the land in Survey No.206/2B1B measuring 14 cents situated at Kunnur village, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District in respect of Petitioner's 14 cents which stands in Petitioner's name and fix the boundaries in the said survey numbers and also issue direction to third respondent herein to provide adequate police protection by considering the writ petitioner's application dated 18.09.2025, within the time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.G. Sailendrababu.
For Respondents : Mr.B.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R3
O R D E R
By relying on a sale deed dated 15.06.2007 and partition deed dated 07.03.2008, the petitioner had applied for a survey of land in survey No.206/2B1B of the extent of 5.75 ares, which corresponds to about 14 cents. The present Writ Petition relates thereto.
2. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no rival title claim. He also points out that the property was subdivided pursuant to the partition as between the petitioner and his sister and that a separate patta was issued for the petitioner's extent. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 and learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
accepts notice for the third respondent.
4. The petitioner has filed both title and revenue documents evidencing the petitioner's entitlement in respect of the property. It is stated that there is no rival title claim.
5. Considering the aforesaid, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the first and second respondents to initiate action in respect of the petitioner's request for a survey after issuing notice to owners of relevant adjacent lands and considering objections, if any, from them. The entire process shall be concluded within three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
NCS : Yes/No 19.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To
1. The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.
2. The Taluk Surveyor, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.
3. The Inspector of Police, Kandamanur Vilakku Police Station, Theni District.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.
apd ORDER MADE IN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.