SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
N.Jainulabdeen – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P.Ganapathi Subramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.B.Saravanan

The court mandates timely consideration of a petitioner’s request under a writ of mandamus as per Article 226 of the Constitution.

Headnote:The Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus under Article 226 for a grant of patta. The court finds that the petitioner's representation for patta is pending consideration and orders the District Collector to decide within three months. The court does not rule on the merits.

Table of Content
1. overview of petitioner's background and request for a patta. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal arguments regarding consideration of petitioner's request. (Para 3)
3. final order directing timely consideration of the request. (Para 4)

O R D E R

The petitioner’s father, Noor Mohamed, had executed a gift settlement deed in favour of the Tamil Nadu government in respect of about 35 cents in survey No.205/1 for use as a pathway. On the basis that such settlement was made on condition that the petitioner's request for patta in respect of 70 cents occupied by the petitioner would be considered, the petitioner had submitted a representation seeking grant of patta.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's request is pending consideration by the District Collector and that reports have been called for from the subordinate revenue officials.

3. Learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for all the respondents. He points out that the settlement deed does not make any reference to an exchange of land. Without prejudice, he submits that the petitioner's request would be considered and disposed of by the District Collector within three (3) months.

4. Accordingly, without making any observations on the merits, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the District Collector to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's request within three (3)

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

NCS : Yes/No 19.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To

1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi Post, Pudukkottai District.

4. The Tahsildar, Aranthangi Post, Pudukkottai District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J.

apd ORDER MADE IN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top