Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.POORNIMA, J
R.Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
S.Valli – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of marriage and separation. (Para 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by parties regarding divorce and restitution. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. assessment of evidence and significance of domestic behavior. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 4. findings on insufficient proof of cruelty and willingness to cohabit. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 5. conclusion and judgment dismissal. (Para 24) |
JUDGMENT
The Appellant/husband has filed these Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals against the judgment dated 03.08.2013 passed in CMA. Nos. 24 and 25 of 2012 on the file of the District Court, Trichy confirming the Order and decretal order dated 06.04.2011 made in HMOP.No.169 of 2003 and 199 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Trichy.
2. The case of the petitioner / husband in both petition in brief.
The marriage between the petitioner and respondent took place on
16.03.2000. At the time of marriage, the petitioner was employed in Muscat. He took the respondent to Muscat in October 2000 as some delay had occurred in obtaining the visa. From the date of marriage the respondent was made complaints against his mother and cousin sisters. After joining with him at Muscat the respondent began to exhibit abnormal b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
