SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67397

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.POORNIMA, J
R.Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
S.Valli – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Balakrishnan

JUDGMENT

The Appellant/husband has filed these Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals against the judgment dated 03.08.2013 passed in CMA. Nos. 24 and 25 of 2012 on the file of the District Court, Trichy confirming the Order and decretal order dated 06.04.2011 made in HMOP.No.169 of 2003 and 199 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Trichy.

2. The case of the petitioner / husband in both petition in brief.

The marriage between the petitioner and respondent took place on

16.03.2000. At the time of marriage, the petitioner was employed in Muscat. He took the respondent to Muscat in October 2000 as some delay had occurred in obtaining the visa. From the date of marriage the respondent was made complaints against his mother and cousin sisters. After joining with him at Muscat the respondent began to exhibit abnormal behavior suspecting his character and even started enquiring with neighbours about the petitioner marital status. On occasion, she stood behind holding a knife. When questioned, she stated that she did not even need knife to kill him and that she could easily do so by mixing poison in his food. Though she wanted to secure a job. However, obtaining a job for women

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top