SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67410

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
P.Vilvamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government Tourism, Culture and Endowment Department – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No appearance
For the Respondents:Mr.Veera Kathiravan Additional Advocate General-II, Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

O R D E R

There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

2. On the last hearing date i.e., on 23.10.2025, the counsel on record for the petitioner filed a Memo reporting “no instructions”. He also submitted that he had already handed over the papers to the petitioner. In view of the same, on the last hearing date i.e., on 23.10.2025, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner in the place of the counsel on record for the petitioner and post the matter today.

3. As directed by this Court, the name of the petitioner has been printed in the cause list today. Despite the same, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. The petitioner has also not engaged any new counsel in place of the earlier counsel. This writ petition is of the year 2023. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top