SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67420

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
Axis Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
T.Bennetraj – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.Uma Vijayan M.R.

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the equipment in the custody of the respondent, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises.

2. When this application came up for hearing on 07.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:-

“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 , seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons.

2. The applicant is a scheduled bank and they have lent money to the respondent for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle under the loan agreement dated 30.04.2024. The respondent has committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the terms and conditions of the loan agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through its notice dated 13.06.2025. As seen from the statement of accounts dated 07.07.2025 filed by the applicant, 6 installments are in arrears, which the respondent has not paid to the applicant. The total value of the 6 installments works to Rs.1,65,021/-.

3. Un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top