Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
R.Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. harassment under the guise of inquiry is addressed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rule of police inquiry based on complaints. (Para 3) |
| 3. clarification on proper procedural conduct during inquiries. (Para 4) |
| 4. final order disposing of the petition. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
2. The case of the petitioner is that under the pretext of conducting an enquiry based on the complaint lodged by one Haji Ali, the respondent Police are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner.
3. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, submitted that based on the complaint given by Haji Ali, the respondent Police are conducting an enquiry in C.S.R.No.324 of 2025 and that the petitioner was called only for enquiry. He further submitted that the petitioner was not harassed by the respondents.
4. Such being the position, it is for the Investigating Agency to issue appropriate notice to the petitioner under Section 35 (3) of BNSS for enquiry and on receipt of such notice, the petitioner shall appear for enquiry and co-operate in the investigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
