Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
Bava Bagurudeen @ Bagurudeen – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the criminal allegations against the petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. violation of fundamental rights under articles 22(1) and 22(5). (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. details of the arrest and compliance with legal procedures. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. mandatory nature of communication of grounds of arrest. (Para 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 5. differentiation in remand legality for a1, a2, and a3 based on grounds of arrest. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. outcome and disposal of the petitions. (Para 15) |
COMMON ORDER
These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed seeking to set aside the orders of remand passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamelkudi, against the petitioners in Crime No.2 of 2025 [renumbered as Crime No.7 of 2025, on the file of NIB-CID, Sivagangai] dated 10.01.2025 and 12.01.2025, respectively.
2. The petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10345 of 2025 is the third accused, and the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10346 of 2025 are the first and second accused in Crime No.2 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 (c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.
3. The allegation in the FIR is that, on receipt of secret inform
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
