Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.Karthikeyan, R.Vijayakumar, JJ
Veeranan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. missing person and police procedure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. resolution of personal disputes through mediation. (Para 3) |
| 3. closure of the case upon mutual consent. (Para 4) |
(Made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
This petitioner has filed the present petition complaining that his minor daughter who was born on 08.04.2007 had been missing on and from 22.10.2025. The petitioner had given a complaint and it has been registered only as CSR by the respondent police. Similarly, the daughter had also given a complaint seeking police protection.
2.Again we must record appreciation of the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station for having registered only a CSR in CSR.No.691 of 2025. They followed the correct procedure in not having registered an F.I.R, since it is only a matter between the father and the daughter.
3.Today, the detenue had been secured. She had married her own cousin. The detenue had come along with her sister-in-law/ her husband's sister. The petitioner is also present. We had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and they had all agreed to live peacefully in their respective homes.
4.We hope the rel
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
