SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67435

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.Karthikeyan, R.Vijayakumar, JJ
Veeranan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
H.C.P(MD).No.1352 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Ayyanar Prem Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar

The court affirmed the autonomy of the individual in personal matters over legal formalities in missing person cases.

Headnote:This case concerns a Habeas Corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India regarding the petitioner's daughter, who was reported missing. The Court appreciated the actions of the police in not registering an F.I.R. and found that the daughter had voluntarily married. The Court facilitated a peaceful resolution. Key issues included the legality of police action and the daughter’s autonomy.

Table of Content
1. missing person and police procedure. (Para 1 , 2)
2. resolution of personal disputes through mediation. (Para 3)
3. closure of the case upon mutual consent. (Para 4)

(Made by C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

This petitioner has filed the present petition complaining that his minor daughter who was born on 08.04.2007 had been missing on and from 22.10.2025. The petitioner had given a complaint and it has been registered only as CSR by the respondent police. Similarly, the daughter had also given a complaint seeking police protection.

2.Again we must record appreciation of the third respondent, Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station for having registered only a CSR in CSR.No.691 of 2025. They followed the correct procedure in not having registered an F.I.R, since it is only a matter between the father and the daughter.

3.Today, the detenue had been secured. She had married her own cousin. The detenue had come along with her sister-in-law/ her husband's sister. The petitioner is also present. We had referred the matter to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre at Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and they had all agreed to live peacefully in their respective homes.

4.We hope the relationship would mend in the near future. The detenue had been handed over to her sister-in-law/sister of her husband to lead her life at the matrimonial home. With the consent of the petitioner, this Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top