SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
Petchiammal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN REV.APLC(MD)No.53 of 2020 in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD)No.8458 of 2021 Palanisamy ... Petitioner/Appellant .Vs.

Petchiammal ... Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to review the judgment and decree of this Court made in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, dated 2.3.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh

O R D E R

This Review Petition is filed to review the judgment and decree of this Court made in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, dated 2.3.2020.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.This Court, while disposing of the above CM.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, passed the order as hereunder:

‘’8.According to the appellant/plaintiff, the suit property is a vacant site and according to the respondent, it is a building who constructed the building is a matter on merits, however, on the date of filing of the suit as to whether the construction was existing in the suit property or not is the only question. Therefore, the appellate Court has rightly observed that the parties have not properly established

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top