IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
Petchiammal – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN REV.APLC(MD)No.53 of 2020 in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD)No.8458 of 2021 Palanisamy ... Petitioner/Appellant .Vs.
Petchiammal ... Respondent/Respondent PRAYER: Review Petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code praying this Court to review the judgment and decree of this Court made in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, dated 2.3.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh
O R D E R
This Review Petition is filed to review the judgment and decree of this Court made in C.M.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, dated 2.3.2020.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3.This Court, while disposing of the above CM.A(MD)No.92 of 2020, passed the order as hereunder:
‘’8.According to the appellant/plaintiff, the suit property is a vacant site and according to the respondent, it is a building who constructed the building is a matter on merits, however, on the date of filing of the suit as to whether the construction was existing in the suit property or not is the only question. Therefore, the appellate Court has rightly observed that the parties have not properly established
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.