Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
M/s. Sahara Prime City Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Ms.Rekha Prakash – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the necessity of full disclosure in legal proceedings. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the discussion on prior orders by the supreme court and their implications. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. the court's decision on recalling orders based on missing material facts. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The review application has been filed by the fourth respondent in the writ petition to review the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25768 of 2025 dated
16.07.2025.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the review applicant, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the second and third respondents.
3. The first respondent/writ petitioner filed the writ petition seeking for a mandamus to the District Collector, Coimbatore to initiate proceedings under the Revenue Recovery Act , based on the order passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority in E.P.No.32 of 2022 in C.C.P.No.32 of 2021 dated
27.07.2022.
4. When the writ petition came up for admission on 16.07.2025, this Court heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader, who appeared for the off
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
