IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. A.D. Maria Clete, J
Duraiammal – Appellant
Versus
K.Lakshmi – Respondent
J U DGMENT
When the matter was listed for hearing on 18.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant, hence, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal” on 19.11.2025 (i.e.,) today. When the matter is .called today there is no representation for the appellant and hence it is clear and evident that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the second appeal.
2. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
19.11.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order dpq To
1. The III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The III Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Madras Chennai.
D r.A.D. MARIA CLETE , J.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.