Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
M/s.Krishna Fashion Studio – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Chennai-III) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks re-export of seized goods. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. relevant laws related to seizure and confiscation discussed. (Para 6) |
| 3. previous cases affirm re-export under specific conditions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court emphasizes balance in adjudication regarding goods. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final order outlines conditions for re-export. (Para 16) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH M/s.Krishna Fashion Studio, represented by its Mr.Vikram Yadav (Proprietor), B1 A-703, S.N.301-1021 Subhash Nagar, Village Road, Bhandup West Mumbai, Mumbai City, Maharashtra. .... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Chennai-III), Preventive Commissionerate, Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (HQ), 7th Floor, Drum Shaped Building, I.P.Bhawan, I.P.Estate, New Delhi. .... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to permit the petitioner to re-export the goods provisionally viz., 27866
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
