Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Dhandapani, J
Ramesh Duraisamy – Appellant
Versus
Foreigners Regional Registration Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pending criminal case does not prevent passport renewal. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented reaffirm the petitioner's position. (Para 4) |
| 3. court reviews previous rulings to determine applicability. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. ratios established support passport application processing despite criminal allegations. (Para 8) |
| 5. final directive to allow writ petition and process passport application. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned order .....the
2nd respondent in his proceedings vide Letter Reference No. OBJ/21071867/25 dated 08.03.2025 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to re-issue the passport to the petitioner within a time frame fixed by this Honble court.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner made application for renewal of passport on 10.01.2025. On 30.09.2025 the second respondent issue a show cause notice stating that the second respondent had received an adverse police verification report stating that the applicant is involved in a case in Cr.No.93 of 2023 on the file of the third respondent'' . Therefore, the petitioner's application is kept pending without any progress and no final repor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
