Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
R.Nallasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Tangedco) Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for shifting electricity pole due to public inconvenience. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. acknowledgment of the representation by the respondents. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's directive to consider the petitioner's representation. (Para 4) |
| 4. judgment instructs action within six weeks. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to shift the electricity pole situated in the cart tack in survey No.648/3B, 649/1 Chikkarasampalayam Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District based on the petitioners representation dated 12.05.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the high tension electric towers/poles are installed as per the Indian Telegraph Act . However,the small electric poles which are erected in the village road and cart track are made as per the procedure laid in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code . In more so, in Rule 6 of Supply code clearly establishes where ever the electric pole causes inconvenience to the public can be shifted. Hence, this Court may direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.
3. The learned Standin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
