SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 80281

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
R.Nallasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Tangedco) Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 12345/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V. Karthikeyan
For the Respondents: Mr.I.Syed Sibghatulla

Electric poles must be shifted per statutory provisions to avoid public inconvenience.

Headnote:This Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to shift an electricity pole as per the procedures laid out in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code. The petitioner highlighted inconvenience caused to the public, citing Rule 6 of the Supply Code. The court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks, confirming the importance of adherence to statutory provisions in addressing public concerns. The petition was ultimately disposed of with orders for action.

Table of Content
1. request for shifting electricity pole due to public inconvenience. (Para 1 , 2)
2. acknowledgment of the representation by the respondents. (Para 3)
3. court's directive to consider the petitioner's representation. (Para 4)
4. judgment instructs action within six weeks. (Para 5)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to shift the electricity pole situated in the cart tack in survey No.648/3B, 649/1 Chikkarasampalayam Village, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District based on the petitioners representation dated 12.05.2025.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the high tension electric towers/poles are installed as per the Indian Telegraph Act. However,the small electric poles which are erected in the village road and cart track are made as per the procedure laid in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code. In more so, in Rule 6 of Supply code clearly establishes where ever the electric pole causes inconvenience to the public can be shifted. Hence, this Court may direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the representation will be considered and orders will be passed within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

4. Heard the learned counsel for both side and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the limited request sought for by the petitioner, this court directs the second respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 12.05.2025 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top