SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 80282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Kumaresh Babu, J
B. Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
The Director of School Education DPI Campus College Road Chennai - 600 006. – Respondent
W.P.(MD).No.6198 of 2025 | W.M.P.(MD).No.4542 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Ponram Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

A Writ Petition can be withdrawn at any stage by the petitioner through their counsel, resulting in dismissal.

Headnote:The judgment relates to a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quash of an order and direction for appointment as Headmaster. The learned Counsel for the petitioner withdrew the petition, leading to its dismissal. The endorsing counsel’s request was honored, resulting in withdrawal without costs. The matter concludes without an order regarding merits.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. withdrawal of petition. (Para 2)

6. Senthil Nathan Headmaster Therku Theru Hindu Nadar Higher Secondary School Mughavoor Rajapalayam Taluk Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent vide his proceedings in Moo.Mu. No.10959/Aa2/2024 dated 20.02.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the Official respondents to appoint the petitioner as Headmaster of the 4th respondent school by taking into consideration of the petitioners merit, ability and seniority, within the period that may be stipulated by this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ponram Kumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top