Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J
R.Rajeswari – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tender participation and allegations of inflated pricing. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims of malice and selective prosecution. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. sufficiency of evidence for maintaining charges. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. dismissal of the quash petition and trial observations. (Para 9 , 10) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18 .11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.Nos.18183 & 18184 of 2025 R.Rajeswari ... Petitioner Vs.
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Salem. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for entire records and quash Spl.C.C.No.2 of 2024 on the file of the Special Court for trial of cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem against the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Hariharan for M/s.KV Law Firm For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner/A4 in Spl.C.C.No.2 of 2024 on the file of the Special Court for Trial of Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Salem filed this quash petition.
2.The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is arrayed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
