Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
B.Anandan – Appellant
Versus
M.Badhrinarayanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the accident and initial police investigation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. overview of lower court decisions and appeal motives. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioners argue lack of evidence in prosecution. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. government argues confirmed involvement in accident. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court reviews evidence, affirms appellate court's findings. (Para 13 , 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. final dismissal of revision petitions. (Para 18) |
COMMON ORDER
B. Anandan, the accused in C.C. No. 1926 of 2012, and Juliet Dola Rose, P.W. 10 in the same case, have filed these two criminal revisions feeling aggrieved by the judgment of the appellate court. They are therefore taken up together and disposed of by this common order.
2. On 28.07.2011, when P.W.15, Ravichandran, was on duty at D6 Anna Square Police Station, Raja, son of Selvam, lodged a complaint stating that he was working as a painter. While he was finishing his work on that day, i.e., on 27.07.2011, at about 10:45 p.m., he was sitting near the Avvaiyar statue. At that time, it suddenly started raining, and he ran to a nearby bus shelter. A black car, coming from south to north on Kamarajar Salai, was driven at high speed and,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
