O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the third respondent.

2. The third respondent had written to the second respondent calling upon him not to register any document pertaining to survey No.37/1 in Neivasal Vilage, since it belongs to Arulmighu Avudayanayagi Ambal Sametha Agameswarar Thirukovil, Pillamangalam Village, Thirumayam Taluk. The writ petitioner had executed a draft sale deed in favour of the fourth respondent and produced the same before the second respondent and called upon him to respond. The second respondent informed the petitioner about the communication received from the third respondent.

3. It is in this background, the present writ petition has been filed. The prayer now sought for in the writ petition has already been extracted.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner is right in his contention that Section 22A of the Registration Act 1908 will kick in only if the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Act, 1959 is applicable. My attention is also drawn to the order date