Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
M.Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Sivagangai District. – Respondent
W.P(MD)No. 32898 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner applies for patta based on previous decree. (Para 1) |
| 2. court acknowledges respondent's acceptance of notice. (Para 2) |
| 3. the petitioner must challenge the order for patta consideration. (Para 3) |
ORDER
By relying on judgment and decree dated 12.04.2002 in O.S.No.121 of
1996, the petitioner had applied for separate patta in respect of land in S.No.
73/1B.
2. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for all the respondents.
3. On perusal of the affidavit, I find that reference is made there to order dated 15.06.2023 of the District Revenue Officer cancelling the earlier order dated 09.05.2005 and further directing the petitioner to approach a civil court. Unless the said order is challenged, the request of the petitioner for a separate patta cannot be considered. By leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the said order, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
