Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA, J
Virendra Prakash Gupta – Appellant
Versus
N.D.GUPTA (Deceased) 1.Davendra Gupta and 19 others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application to add parties to a case. (Para 1) |
| 2. service of notice and lack of representation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. application allowed. (Para 4) |
PRAYER: Application is filed to bring on record the respondents 17 to 20 the legal heirs of the deceased 13th defendant Latha Gupta, as party Defendants 19 to 22 in C.S.No.485 of 2001.
For Applicant(s): M/s.V.Srimathi For Respondent(s): No representation for R17 to R20
ORDER
This Application is filed to bring on record the respondents 17 to 20 as Defendants 19 to 22 in C.S.No.485 of 2001.
2. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the notice has been served on R17 to R20 and Affidavit of Service has also been filed.
3. The Registry has also made an endorsement that Court notice served on R17 to R20. Despite notice being served on R17 to R20, there is no representation for them.
4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is allowed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
