The court upheld the authority under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to seize property for loan repayment and established a process for potential recovery by the borrower.

ORDER

This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for seizing the equipment in the custody of the respondent, if necessary, with police protection and by breaking open the premises.

2. When this application came up for hearing on 19.08.2025, this Court passed the following order:-

“This application has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons.

2. The applicant is a scheduled bank and they have lent money to the respondent for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle under the loan agreement dated 11.04.2019. The respondent has committed default in the repayment of the loan as per the terms and conditions of the loan agreement. The applicant has also recalled the loan through its notice dated 13.06.2025. As seen from the statement of account dated 07.07.2025 filed by the applicant, 7 installments are in arrears, which the respondent has not paid to the applicant. The total value of the 7 installments works out to Rs.1,14,589/-.

3. Under the loan agreement dated 11.04.2019, the applicant is empowered to repossess the vehicle in case the respondent commits default in the repayment of the loan. There exists an arbitration clause in the loan agreement dated 11.04.2019. The applicant has expressed its willingness to go for arbitration in accordance with the said arbitration clause. The applicant has expressed its difficulty to repossess the vehicle on its own. Since the applicant has made out a prima-facie case for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner, this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of repossessing the vehicle from the respondent or wherever it is found. Eventhough this Court is inclined to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons, an opportunity must be given to the respondent to take back the vehicle from the applicant once a sum of Rs.1,14,589/- is paid within a period of three days from the date of seizure of the said vehicle from the respondent.

4. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is issuing the following directions:-

(a) Ms.L.Padma Priya, Advocate, having office at No.H-84, 15^th sector, KK Nagar, Chennai-78, Mobile No.8610807983, is appointed as Advocate Commissioner to repossess the vehicle morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons from the respondent or wherever it is available.

(b) The Advocate Commissioner is permitted to obtain the police aid whenever required and she is also permitted to break open the premises in case the vehicle is kept in a locked premises in the presence of the police after taking proper inventory.

(c) On repossession of the subject vehicle, the Advocate Commissioner shall send a communication to the respondent intimating that a sum of Rs.1,14,589/- is due and payable towards the arrears of installment by the respondent to the applicant, in respect of the aforesaid loan agreement.

(d) On receipt of such intimation, the respondent shall pay the aforesaid amount within a period of three days from the date of receipt of a communication from the Advocate Commissioner and on payment of such sum, the applicant shall handover the vehicle back to the respondent and the Advocate Commissioner shall cooperate with the applicant for the same.

(e) The applicant shall initiate arbitration in accordance with the arbitration agreement contained in the contract within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case, the applicant fails to initiate arbitration within the stipulated time, the order passed by this Court today shall stand autom