SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 68007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
Jose Anthony – Appellant
Versus
R.Murugan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Banuprasath
For the Respondents: No Appearance

ORDER

1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgement of conviction and sentence, dated 27.06.2024, passed in Crl.A.No.11 of 2024, by the Additional District (FTC) Court, Theni, confirming the judgement of conviction and sentence, dated 01.08.2023, passed in STC.No.13 of 2013, by the Judicial Magistrate Court, FTC, Uthamapalayam.

2. The facts of the case in a nutshell, led to filing of this Criminal Revision Case and necessary for disposal of the same, are as follows:-

(a)The Revision Petitioner is the accused and the Respondent is the Complainant. It is alleged that the Revision Petitioner/ Accused had borrowed a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- from the Respondent/Complainant on 11.09.2022 and to discharge the said debt, the Revision Petitioner/Accused had issued a post dated cheque, bearing No. 692928, dated 07.12.2022, for a sum Rs.8,00,000/-, drawn on State Bank of India, Ksrunapuram Panchayat, Koottar, Idukki District, Kerala in favour of the Respondent/Complainant. When the said cheque was presented for encashment on 09.12.2022, the same was returned with the endorsement “Funds Insufficient”. Thereafter, the Respondent/Complainant had issued a notice, dated 24.12.2022, to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top