Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Sakthivel, J
U.Jinadoss – Appellant
Versus
M.G.Mohammed Rafiq – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. revocation of an interim injunction based on filings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. exploration of the trial court's rejection of petition. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. determination of necessity of parties and validity of sales. (Para 6) |
Respondents 6 & 7 PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Order passed in I.A.SR.No.3084 of 2019 in O.S.No.79 of 2013 dated March 19, 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Tambaram and consequently direct the Sub Court, Tambaram to number the said I.A.SR.No.3084 of 2019 and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.R.K.Rithani for Mr.T.Sai Krishnan For Respondents -
1, 3 to 6 : Mr.P.Sam Japa Singh No appearance For Respondent – 2 : vacated
O R D E R
Feeling aggrieved by the rejection Order passed in unnumbered I.A.(SR)No.3084 of 2019 dated March 19, 2019 in O.S.No.79 of 2013 on the file of 'Sub Court, Tambaram' (hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Court'), the petitioner/plaintiff therein has filed this Civil Revision Petition.
2.The Revision Petitioner herein is the plaintiff. The plaintiff filed a Suit for specific performance based on two agreements da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
