Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.SARAVANAN, J
M/s Ragam Textiles – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner (ST) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner represented by a partner in a writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. impediments due to expired limitation for appeal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. remittal of case for fresh order subject to tax deposits. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. conclusions regarding compliance and tax recovery proceed. (Para 10 , 11) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.46798 and 46800 of 2025 M/s Ragam Textiles, represented by its partner R.Balachandran, 1048 Kotthu Thottam, Onnipalayam Village, Coimbatore – 641 019. ... Petitioner Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Periyanaickenpalayam Circle, Coimbatore – 641 018. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in GSTIN:33AAMFR8072P1ZF/2018-19, quash the order dated 25.03.2024 passed therein.
For Petitioner : M/s.C.P.Priya For Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate ***********
O R D E R
Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
