Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Oulaganathan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for enhanced compensation in land acquisition. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. request for reconsideration directed to authority. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final ruling disposing the petition with instructions. (Para 7) |
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Oulaganathan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Union of India, Rep. By the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Pondicherry, Puducherrry – 605 001.
2.The District Collector (Revenue), I-Floor, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherrry – 605 009.
3.The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-cum-
Land Acquisition Officer, Special Economic Zone, Villianur, Puducherry – 605 001. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent/The District Collector (Revenue) to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2019 and 12.06.2025 to re-determine the compensation awarded to the petitioner for his lands mentioned above in the tabular column measuring an extent of 0.18.75 Ares acquired at Karasur Revenue Village in Award No.2/2008 to a sum of Rs.21,261/- per Are, pursuant to the enhanced c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
