Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
T.Udayakumar – Appellant
Versus
G.Kalyanasundaram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the criminal revision petition filed against prior judgments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. presumption under section 139 and implications of non-denial. (Para 11 , 14) |
| 3. evidence and testimony supporting the conviction under section 138. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. final ruling and confirmation of lower court decisions. (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgement made in Crl.A.No.20 of 2019, dated 05.08.2025, on the file of the Sessions Fast Track Mahila Court, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil, confirming the judgement dated 04.01.2019, made in STC.No.842 of 2018 on the file of the Fast Track Court, (Magistrate Level), Nagercoil.
2.The facts of the case in a nutshell, led to filing of this Criminal Revision Case and necessary for disposal of the same, are as follows:-
a) The Revision Petitioner is the accused and the Respondent is the Complainant. It is alleged that the Revision Petitioner/Accused had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- from the Respondent/Complainant on 12.12.2012, promising to repay the said amount within one month and the Revision Petitioner/Accused had also issued a Cheque bearing No. 386532, dated 04.03.2013, drawn on Tamil Nadu M
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
