Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. N. Senthilkumar, J
Madhampatty Thangavelu Hospitality Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ms. Joy Crizildaa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for interim injunction for disparagement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of revenue loss and defamation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defendant's counterarguments regarding personal disputes with plaintiff director. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. definition and interpretation of disparagement. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. need for substantial evidence to support claims of disparagement. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. court's evaluation of plaintiff's standing for injunction. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. legal principles regarding disparagement and injunctions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. final ruling on plaintiff's application. (Para 21 , 22) |
ORDER
This application has been filed by the applicant/plaintiff for an order of ad-interim injunction. The applicant herein is the plaintiff and the respondents herein are the defendants in the suit. The applicant/plaintiff has filed the above suit for the following reliefs:
a) a permanent injunction restraining the 1st defendant, her men, agents, representatives or any persons claiming under or through her, from in any manner tagging, hashtag, making, writing, uploading, printing, publishing, broadcasting, distributing, posting, circulating, or disseminating in any fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
