Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
G.Amirtharaj – Appellant
Versus
J.Selvaraj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's authority and provisions regarding compounding. (Para 1 , 2 , 19 , 21) |
| 2. conviction and case details. (Para 3) |
| 3. compromise terms and payments. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. acceptance of compromise leads to annulment of conviction. (Para 25) |
| 5. final verdict of acquittal. (Para 26) |
ORDER
Heard Mr.KA.Ramakrishnan, learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner and Mr.S.Muthumalairaja, learned Counsel for the Respondent and also this Court has taken the assistance of Mr.A.S.Abul Kalam Azad, learned Government Advocate.
2. This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the to set aside the orders passed in Crl.A.No.49 of 2019 dated 19.08.2025 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District, confirming the judgment in C.C.No.231 of 2016 dated 27.03.2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.
3. The facts of the case in a nutshell, led to filing of this Criminal Revision Petition and necessary for disposal of the same, are as follows:-
a) The Revision Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
