IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
G.Amirtharaj – Appellant
Versus
J.Selvaraj – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr.KA.Ramakrishnan, learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner and Mr.S.Muthumalairaja, learned Counsel for the Respondent and also this Court has taken the assistance of Mr.A.S.Abul Kalam Azad, learned Government Advocate.
2. This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the to set aside the orders passed in Crl.A.No.49 of 2019 dated 19.08.2025 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District, confirming the judgment in C.C.No.231 of 2016 dated 27.03.2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.
3. The facts of the case in a nutshell, led to filing of this Criminal Revision Petition and necessary for disposal of the same, are as follows:-
a) The Revision Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Sattur, Virudhunagar District in C.C.No. 231 of 2016, by the judgment dated 27.03.2019, to undergo one year simple imprisonment for the offence alleged under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. Aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court, the Revision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.