JUDGMENT

Dr.G.Jayachandran, J.

The suit filed for declaration of title and possession and other allied reliefs by the plaintiff has also sought leave of the Court to sue as an indigent person.

2. Since the property and most of the defendants are within the jurisdiction of the Original side of the Madras High Court, suit has been laid on the Original side of the Madras High Court along with leave to sue the defendants who are outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court.

3. When the Master tested the application for filing the suit as indigent person, he rejected that application and also made a passing reference that the Suit itself is barred by limitation. We place on record that the observation regarding the jurisdiction and the power conferred to a Master cannot have any bearing on the judicial decision by the Court.

4. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the application to sue as indigent person, the plaintiff has moved application before the learned single Judge, who considered it, received report from the District Collector, NTR District, Vijayawada and has granted leave to sue as indigent person.

5. The next stage for the plaintiff was to get leave to sue the defendants who