Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
Neelaveni Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
National Bank For Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to disciplinary termination process. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. explanation for delay in court filing. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. jurisdiction of disciplinary actions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. requirement of compliance by borrowing authority. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal based on admission of charges and delay. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to and in connection with office order No.89 dated 19.06.2004 read with NB.CVC/293/14/2004-05 dated 21.06.2004 as confirmed by order bearing No.NB.CVC/54/14/2005-06 dated 28.04.2005 passed by the respondent No.2 and respondent No.1 respectively and to quash the same.
2. By virtue of the impugned proceedings, the services of the petitioner as General Manager of the respondent No.1 were terminated. For better appreciation, it is necessary to state certain relevant facts for disposal of the present writ petition.
3. The petitioner herein, who was initially appointed as Grade B Officer by the Reserve Bank of India, was posted as Senior Analyst in Agricultural Refinance Development Corporation in the year 1979 and thereafter, she was promoted as De
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
