Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
, ACJ
J.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau Investigation, Special Crime Branch, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the cases against the petitioners. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution case background and high court's directive. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioners' arguments regarding delay and identification issues. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. prosecutor's response and defense arguments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. details of events leading to violence on 19.02.2009. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. context of the incident and law enforcement response. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. concerns about due process and excessive force. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. call for unity and resolution between lawyers and police. (Para 23) |
| 9. decision to quash proceedings based on abuse of process. (Para 24) |
| 10. outcome of the petition—quashing of all cases. (Para 25 , 26) |
COMMON ORDER
The petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9679 of 2025 is an accused in C.C.No.622 of 2025, petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9652 of 2025 is an accused in C.C.No.624 of 2025, petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9651 of 2025 is an accused in C.C.No.625 of 2025 and petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9646 of 2025 is an accused in C.C.No.626 of 2025.
2.Since all cases arise out of the common FIR in RC.2(S)/2009 dated 09.03.2009 and the grounds raised by the petitioners are identical, all pet
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
