SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7

MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J, , CJ
Koranan v. State


Advocates:
For the Appellants: [Name1, Name2]
For the Respondents: [Name3]

1 Accused 1 to 3, 5 and 6 are petitioners. Accused 1 and 2 were convicted by the Additional First Class Magistrate (II). Madural for an offence under S.224 IPC and each of them , was sentenced to R.I. for one year. Accused 3, 5 and 6 were convicted under S.147 and 225 IPO and each of them was sentenced to RI for one year under each count, the sentences to run concurrently. On appeal the Sessions Judge of Madurai set - aside the conviction and sentence of accused 3, 5 and 6 under S.147 IPC and confirmed the conviction and sentences of accused 1 and 2 under S.224 IPC and of accused 3, 5 and 6 under S.225 IPC.

2 In connection with a prohibition raid, accused 1 and 2 were arrested, handcuffed and taken by the police. Two other Koravars also were handcuffed and taken by the police. While those persons were being taken to the police station, on the way accused 3 to 6 and some others came in a body and demanded the release of accused 1 and a and the other two Koravars. The police refused to release them. Thereupon the police party was stoned by accused 3 to 6 and others and accused 1 and 2 were forcibly taken away. But their attempt to lake away the other two Koravavs failed. There is no



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top