SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Ramaswami, J
In re Chandrasekaran Accused


Table of Content
1. defining 'shop' under the madras shops act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. interpretation of businesses and integral parts. (Para 4 , 5)
3. precedent on industrial establishment versus shop. (Para 6)
4. final determination of the premises as a shop. (Para 7)

1. This revision petitioner was convicted of an offence under clauses 1 and 7 of R.16 read with R.18 of the Rules framed under S. 49(1) of the Madras Shops and Establishments Act (XXXVI of 1947), and sentenced to a fine. The matter comes before us on a reference by Ramaswami, J. who felt that an important point was involved, namely, whether the small unit set up by the lorry company in this case for the servicing of their vehicles could be properly designated as a "shop" or "commercial establishment" within the ambit of the Act.

2. We might immediately set forth here the definition of "shop" occurring in S. 2(16) of the Act, which is as follows: -
"'shop' means any premises where any trade or business is carried on or where services are rendered to customers, and includes offices, store rooms, godowns, or warehouses whether in the same premises or otherwise, used in connexion with such business but does not include a resta









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top