SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 2

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Alagiriswami, J.
Thirumal Naidu A. E. v. Rajmmal


Table of Content
1. validity of case for restitution of conjugal rights. (Para 1)
2. separation agreements may not counter conjugal rights claims. (Para 2)
3. separation agreements are considered against public policy. (Para 3)
4. appeal dismissed without costs. (Para 4)

1. The question that arises in this case does not so far appear to have come up for decision before any court. That question is whether an agreement between a husband and wife to live separately can be urged in answer to a suit for restitution of conjugal rights by one of the parties. In this case the wife instituted a suit for restitution of conjugal rights against her husband and in answer the husband put forward an agreement between them to live separate. This plea was found against by both the courts below and the second appeal is against the judgement the appellate court.

2. Under the English law it is well established that a pre - nuptial agreement 10 live separate would not be valid. Even a post - nuptial agreement would not be valid, If it is one to live separately in future. But a present agreement to live separately would be valid. See Chitty on Contracts, 22nd Edn, paragraph 1200, where it is stated as follows






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top