SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 11

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Ramaprasada Rao, J.
Kaluvaroya Pillai and Others v. Ganesa Pandithan and Others


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding civil miscellaneous appeals and remand. (Para 1 , 2)
2. scope of appeal against remand orders. (Para 3 , 10)
3. judicial observations on remand orders. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 12)
4. legal basis surrounding the appeal's procedures. (Para 5 , 6 , 9)
5. final conclusion on the status of appeals. (Para 11 , 13)

1. The above batch of civil miscellaneous appeals are against the order of the Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram in A. S. 151 of 1963, 27 of 1959 and 29 to 32 of 1959, whereunder he modified the judgment and decree of the District Munsif, Ramanathapuram, in the Original suits tried by the latter, and remanded the same on a particular aspect. The appeals before the lower Appellate Court were all connected and filed by the appellants against the respondents in those civil miscellaneous appeals. In all the suits the respondents claimed that the suit lands were pannai lands and therefore they had domain over the same and that the appellants are bound to recognise such right in them as iruwaramdars and liable to pay rent therefor. Both the Courts below found concurrently that the lands situated in the village of Karungulam is a pre - settlement dharmasanam





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top