SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 19

MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J
Mr. Chagla – Appellant
Versus
Arunachalathammal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Chagla
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. introduction to family and estate. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding entitlement under the act. (Para 2 , 5)
3. court's findings on simultaneous inheritance rules. (Para 3 , 4)
4. conclusion of judgment regarding dismissal. (Para 6)

1. One Arumugam had three sons, - Thanu, Shanmugam and Sankaran, and a daughter Ramalakshmi. Shanmugam died in 1942 and his estate devolved upon his daughter Chidambarathammal. By virtue of S.14 of the Hindu Succession Act , she acquired, when that Act was brought into force an absolute interest in the estate inherited by her from Shanmugam. Chidambarathammal died in February, 1957, when she was a minor and unmarried. Arunachalathammal, one of the daughters of Ramalakshmi Ammal, sister of Shanmugam, commenced an action in the Court of the District Munsiff for partition and separate possession of her l / 24th share out of the estate of Chidambarathammal. The claim was resisted by the sons of Thanu and Sankatan - brothers of Shanmugam. The Trial Court decreed the claim and that decree was confirmed in second appeal to the High Court of Madras.

2. In this appeal Mr. Chagla, for the appellant, contends that Arunachalathammal was under the Hind





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top