MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J
Mr. Chagla – Appellant
Versus
Arunachalathammal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to family and estate. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlement under the act. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. court's findings on simultaneous inheritance rules. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. conclusion of judgment regarding dismissal. (Para 6) |
1. One Arumugam had three sons, - Thanu, Shanmugam and Sankaran, and a daughter Ramalakshmi. Shanmugam died in 1942 and his estate devolved upon his daughter Chidambarathammal. By virtue of S.14 of the Hindu Succession Act , she acquired, when that Act was brought into force an absolute interest in the estate inherited by her from Shanmugam. Chidambarathammal died in February, 1957, when she was a minor and unmarried. Arunachalathammal, one of the daughters of Ramalakshmi Ammal, sister of Shanmugam, commenced an action in the Court of the District Munsiff for partition and separate possession of her l / 24th share out of the estate of Chidambarathammal. The claim was resisted by the sons of Thanu and Sankatan - brothers of Shanmugam. The Trial Court decreed the claim and that decree was confirmed in second appeal to the High Court of Madras.
2. In this appeal Mr. Chagla, for the appellant, contends that Arunachalathammal was under the Hind
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.