SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20

MADRAS HIGH COURT
, J
Rajarama Iyer B. S. v. Parasumanna K. (deed.)Rama-swami Iyer


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

Table of Content
1. facts regarding tenant's application for fair rent fixation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's observation on the limitations imposed by different sections. (Para 3 , 4)

1. The petitioners herein are the legal representatives of the original landlady. The respondent who is a tenant in respect of a vacant piece of land, filed an application for fixation of fair rent under S.7 - A of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act , 1922, hereinafter referred to as the Act. That petition was resisted by the petitioners on two grounds : (1) that the tenant cannot seek the benefit of the said Act and have the fair rent fixed under the provisions of that Act and (2) that a portion of the property referred to in the petition for fixation of fair rent was not the subject - matter of the original lease. The learned District Munsif, Madurai town, held that the ground of objection raised by the petitioners was not tenable that the tenant was entitled to the benefits of the Act and that the entire property for which the fair rent is sought to be fixed comprised in the original lease deed. After rejecting the objections raised by the petitioners, the learned District Munsif proceeded to fix the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top