MADRAS HIGH COURT
A, J
State v. Subbaraj and Co.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tax liability arises from the consumption of purchased goods in manufacturing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prior case law establishes criteria for consumption in tax liability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. goods not consumed in their identity are exempt from tax. (Para 12) |
| 4. tribunal's conclusion upheld; all petitions dismissed. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. All these three cases raise the question relating to liability to tax under S.7 - A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 . In these cases, the dealer buys raw bones. The raw bones are converted into crushed bones. The process is done through breaking the bones in a disintegrator. In the process of breaking the bones into pieces of 3/8" and 5/8" bones, bone grist, bone - meal, fluff horns and hoof are obtained. Roughly 50 per cent of raw bone is obtained as crushed bone; 15 per cent of raw bone is obtained as bone grist; about 15 per cent is obtained as bone - meal; about 10 per cent is obtained as fluff; about 5 per cent is obtained as horn hoof. The rest becomes waste. The dealers in T.C. No. 337 of 1979 exported crushed bone, but all the three dealers sold bone - meal, bone grist, fluff and horn hoof locally. As far as export is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.