Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Nachal v. State of T.N.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case and initial allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against impleading based on insufficient evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the application of evidence. (Para 6 , 8 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. interpretation of s.319 crpc and relevant case law. (Para 7 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final decision to allow revision and directive to expedite trial. (Para 16 , 17) |
1. This revision is preferred by Mrs. Nachal the petitioner herein, against the order dated 9-1-1995 passed in CC No. 230 of 1992 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, allowing the petition filed by Assistant Public Prosecutor under S.319 Criminal Procedure Code to implead the petitioner as one of the accused.
2. The case in brief is as follows : -
One Seethai Aachi, the complainant has given her daughter in marriage at Amaravathi Pudur. She has friendly acquaintance with one Mrs. Nachal the petitioner who is a resident of the same village. On her request, the complainant Seethai Aachi gave a loan amount of Rs. 20,000/- to the petitioner. On 18-8-1990, at about 6.30 p.m., the complainant Seethai Aachi as requested by the petitioner, went to the petitioner's house and received back the loan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
