SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 1

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J
Group General Manager (C) Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Karaikal v. Gouthamchand Gothi M.


1.Respondent in Arbitration O.P. No. 1 of 1996, on the file of Additional District Court, Karaikal, is the revision petitioner.

2. The Revision is filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India. Respondent herein entered into three contracts with the petitioner on 20-7-1990, 8-8-1990 and 17-1-1992. All these agreements provide for arbitration in the event of dispute arising between the parties relating to the terms and conditions or as to any other question, claim, right, matter or thing whatsoever in any way arising out of or relating to the terms and conditions of the contract. The contracts also provide for the appointment of a sole arbitrator to decide the dispute, who will have to be appointed by the petitioner on the request made by the party. During the progress of work, dispute arose between the parties in regard to certain matters and, therefore, as per registered letter dated 18-3-1993, respondent herein requested the petitioner to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause. Petitioner received three separate notices dated 18-3-1993, on 22-3-1993. A reminder was also sent. But the purpose was not achieved. Petitioner - Oil and Natural Gas Commission refused to









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top