Back
MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. Manikumar, J
Group General Manager (C) Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Karaikal v. Gouthamchand Gothi M.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent petitions for arbitration due to dispute under contract. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner contends application is barred by limitation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court reviews application against arguments raised. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. discussion on limitation concerning arbitration rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court determines application was beyond the limitation period; order set aside. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
1.Respondent in Arbitration O.P. No. 1 of 1996, on the file of Additional District Court, Karaikal, is the revision petitioner.
2. The Revision is filed under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India. Respondent herein entered into three contracts with the petitioner on 20-7-1990, 8-8-1990 and 17-1-1992. All these agreements provide for arbitration in the event of dispute arising between the parties relating to the terms and conditions or as to any other question, claim, right, matter or thing whatsoever in any way arising out of or relating to the terms and conditions of the contract. The contracts also provide for the appointment of a sole arbitrator to decide the dispute, who will have to be appointed by the petitioner on the request made by the party. During the progres
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
