SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Rama-moorthy, J
Sankar Sealing Systems P. Ltd. (M/s.) v. M/s. Jain Motor Trading Co. and Another


Table of Content
1. overview of applications and plaintiff's claim. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. defendants' applications to avoid security and seek arbitration. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. contentions on the validity of arbitration clause. (Para 6 , 7 , 17)
4. court's considerations on the arbitration claims. (Para 8 , 18 , 19)
5. interpretation of arbitration clause's enforceability. (Para 20 , 21)
6. findings on vagueness and applicability of clause. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
7. court's final orders and dismissal of applications. (Para 30)

1. A. No. 5296/2002 : This application is to direct the respondents / defendants to furnish security for the suit claim of Rs.13,41,165.75 with interest and subsequent costs and in the event of failure, to pass an order of Attachment before Judgment of the movables shown in the Judges summons.

A. No. 918 of 2003 : This Application is filed to set aside the order passed in A. No. 5296 of 2002 directing the respondents / defendants to furnish the security.

A. No. 927 of 2003 : This application is filed under S.8 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act to refer the claim to Arbitration.

All these applications are heard together and disposed of by this common o


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top