SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 10

MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. Karpagavinayagam, J
M/s. Synergy Credit Corporation Limited v. M/s. Midland Industries Limited and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. R. Chellamuthu
For the Respondents: Mr. T. K. Sampath

1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant challenging the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVIII, Saidapet, Chennai, in C.C. No. 3436 of 1996, dated 20-3-1998, acquitting the accused for the offence under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

2. The complainant has come forward with the allegation that it is a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having its Principal Office at Mumbai and a Branch Office amongst other places in India including at Chennai. The complainant has stated that the accused on 9-11-1995 came forward with a written request for discounting a Bill of exchange for a face value of Rs. 15,00,000/- for covering a transaction with M/s. Nalanda Synthetics Limited, Hyderabad.

3. A complaint was filed by the complainant through PW 1, who has been duly authorised by a power of attorney document, Ex. P1. Ex. P2 is the letter of request given by the accused to the complainant for discounting a bill of exchange for a value of Rs. 15,00,000/-. The bill is marked as Ex. P3. The delivery chalan is marked as Ex. P4. The bill of exchange is Ex. P5. The accused also issued a cheque dated 7-2-1996 for a



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top